Food & Beverage Domains Across 505 TLDs

These domains are food and beverage keyword names spread across 505 TLDs, including examples like produce.mom, breakfast.cafe, recipe.organic, and tea.help. Updated daily. The set is broad in extension mix, so selection quality depends heavily on TLD fit, memorability, and trademark distance.

GitHub

Domain names

AcquisitionSpread
produce.mom
50
Premium

94
18%
bread.doctor
70
Available
$154.98

102
33%
breakfast.cafe
70
Resell

96
22%
room.management
100
Resell

130
32%
hall.gg
40
Resell

80
29%
lunch.bet
80
Resell

111
26%
staff.security
40
Premium

98
23%
recipe.organic
70
Premium

82
27%
bread.cyou
70
Premium
$71.83

$287.3/yr
102
33%
tea.help
60
Premium

102
42%
cooking.gold
50
Premium

88
25%
staff.build
40
Premium

98
23%
diner.gives
85
Premium

85
12%
dining.camera
75
Available
$72.98

81
16%
cocktail.recipes
80
Resell

114
21%
pub.bar
70
Premium

94
29%
experience.plus
30
Resell

98
42%
eating.buzz
60
Premium

92
17%
bake.cash
60
Premium

96
22%
formal.condos
70
Available
$71.99

$75.99/yr
94
14%
recipe.bingo
70
Premium

82
27%
eating.baby
60
Premium

92
17%
eating.io
60
Resell

92
17%
when.casino
50
Premium

114
27%
staff.expert
40
Premium

98
23%
dessert.contact
80
Premium

86
17%
grocery.reise
70
Premium

102
21%
water.reise
80
Available
$127.98

108
45%
dessert.estate
80
Premium

86
17%
fine.christmas
80
Available
$49.98

80
31%
Previewing the first 30 of 28,169 matching domains.

The full database continues below.

Create an account to unlock the full result set, save this search, and get notified when new domains match your filters.

Full results

See every matching domain, not just the preview.

Alerts on new matches

Save this search and get notified when fresh domains fit your filters.

Decision signals

Compare 18 decision signals across price, renewal, comps, spread, and risk.

Deeper filters

Refine with 41 available filters across TLD, price, quality, and risk.

Watchlists

Track the few domains you care about most.

Portfolio tracking

Track owned domains, pricing, and renewal posture in one place.

Insights

See demand mix, pricing distribution, and search snapshots at a glance.

Export

Download your results on supported plans.

API

Query the database programmatically on supported plans.

Search insights

Each card explains one signal behind the visible search preview.

Value quadrant

The largest opportunity pocket sits in Low demand / Low price.

Visible breakdown

  • High demand / Low price52 results • 1%
  • High demand / High price14 results • 0%
  • Low demand / Low price5,155 results • 93%
  • Low demand / High price304 results • 6%

Liquidity

Liquidity is currently concentrated in Low demand.

Visible breakdown

  • Top 15% demand277 results • 1%
  • High demand519 results • 2%
  • Low demand24,625 results • 97%

Price distribution

Most visible domains in this search cluster in < $500.

Visible breakdown

  • < $5004,314 results • 78%
  • $500-$2k822 results • 15%
  • $2k-$5k273 results • 5%
  • $5k-$10k74 results • 1%
  • $10k+43 results • 1%

TLD mix

The visible preview is led by .space, which currently carries the largest share of results.

Visible breakdown

  • .space133 results • 12%
  • .store131 results • 12%
  • .site125 results • 11%
  • .online119 results • 11%
  • .tech118 results • 11%
  • .expert110 results • 10%
  • .cloud103 results • 9%
  • .zone97 results • 9%
  • .ninja93 results • 8%
  • .gg83 results • 7%

Quality mix

Demand concentration is strongest in Low (0-39), which gives the clearest read on this search's quality mix.

Visible breakdown

  • Low (0-39)24,625 results • 87%
  • Mid (40-69)2,747 results • 10%
  • High (70-84)519 results • 2%
  • Top 15% (85+)277 results • 1%

Risk proxies

Low demand is the most common risk signal in this search preview.

Visible breakdown

  • Mainstream TLD100 results • 0%
  • Premium status8,166 results • 24%
  • High renewal1,699 results • 5%
  • Low demand24,626 results • 71%

FAQ

Direct answers about the current public search and how to read its market signals.

What is this search best for?

Best for investors and operators who want a fast read on market depth, pricing reality, and where the cleaner deal pockets concentrate.

What is the strongest signal in this search?

28,169 visible matches cluster around a median ask of $4,357, with 28169% already sitting in buyable inventory types.

What should I watch in this search?

519% of the current set reads as lower-risk in the public safety proxy, while only 1616% lands in the ready-picks band, so quality is concentrated rather than evenly spread across the search.

What kinds of domains are in this selection?

These are domain names tied to food and beverage keywords. The set spans 505 TLDs and includes combinations such as produce.mom, breakfast.cafe, recipe.organic, and tea.help.

Are these domains mainly mainstream extensions?

The selection is broad by extension count, not concentrated in one TLD. That makes TLD fit a core evaluation point for each name.

How should founders evaluate these domains?

Prioritize names that sound credible, are easy to remember, and match the extension to the business clearly. Strong keyword fit matters less if the full domain feels awkward or hard to trust.

How should investors compare these domains?

Look for pairings where the keyword and extension create clear commercial logic. Broad TLD coverage can produce edge cases, but resale appeal usually depends on buyer trust and obvious end use.

What are the main risks in this set?

The main risk is mismatch between the keyword and the extension. Some names may be memorable but still weak commercially if the TLD feels novelty-driven or limits buyer confidence.

Are pricing and renewal conclusions available here?

No reliable pricing or renewal statistics are provided for this selection. Evaluate each domain on name quality, extension fit, and trademark distance rather than assuming uniform value.

The platform view

You've seen the preview.Now unlock the full decision engine.

This public page shows only a fraction of the platform. Turn this search into a saved workflow with deeper data, tracking, and next-step clarity built in.